{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action1a95na44kgedjk3k64ajpfp4p9d9jj3sgzc6tt9nmnkvgj7c9nraqq7g4d2u",
    "summary": "Tingvard judges the “Cardano Budget Process Framework (facilitated by Intersect)” governance action constitutional.",
    "rationaleStatement": "This governance action is correctly submitted as an “Info” action under Article II, §6 and Article III, §1–§4 of the Cardano Constitution. Info actions create an on-chain record and provide information to the governance system but do not themselves enact changes to the protocol, parameters, treasury, or governance structure. The proposal therefore falls within the permissible scope of informational governance actions.This framework contains proposed actions that can affect future treasury withdrawals and therefore falls under Article III, §1, 4\nThe action satisfies the procedural requirements of Article II, §6. It provides a title, abstract, motivation, rationale, and supporting materials referenced through immutable hashes and URLs. These elements ensure that the off-chain documentation referenced by the governance action is verifiable and cannot be altered after submission, satisfying the constitutional requirement that governance actions provide sufficient context and supporting materials.\nThe proposal records a structured framework for the Cardano ecosystem budget process. The document outlines a multi-stage process covering strategic preparation, proposal submission, review cycles, prioritization, consolidation into treasury withdrawal actions, and subsequent execution and monitoring. As an Info action, this framework does not itself authorize treasury withdrawals and therefore does not trigger the requirements governing “Treasury Withdrawals” actions in Article II, §7. Instead, it records the procedural approach that may guide future budget cycles and the preparation of subsequent treasury withdrawal proposals.\nThe framework also recognizes the constitutional guardrails governing treasury withdrawals, including the requirement that withdrawals must not exceed the Net Change Limit (NCL) and must follow the governance processes defined by the Constitution. By explicitly acknowledging the need for an approved NCL and by stating that treasury withdrawal governance actions must follow the applicable constitutional processes, the framework is consistent with the treasury guardrails defined in Appendix I.\nThis governance action is correctly submitted as an “Info” action under Article II, §6 and Article III, §1–§4 of the Cardano Constitution. Info actions create an on-chain record and provide information to the governance system but do not themselves enact changes to the protocol, parameters, treasury, or governance structure. The proposal therefore falls within the permissible scope of informational governance actions.This framework contains proposed actions that can affect future treasury withdrawals and therefore falls under Article III, §1, 4\nThe action satisfies the procedural requirements of Article II, §6. It provides a title, abstract, motivation, rationale, and supporting materials referenced through immutable hashes and URLs. These elements ensure that the off-chain documentation referenced by the governance action is verifiable and cannot be altered after submission, satisfying the constitutional requirement that governance actions provide sufficient context and supporting materials.\nThe proposal records a structured framework for the Cardano ecosystem budget process. The document outlines a multi-stage process covering strategic preparation, proposal submission, review cycles, prioritization, consolidation into treasury withdrawal actions, and subsequent execution and monitoring. As an Info action, this framework does not itself authorize treasury withdrawals and therefore does not trigger the requirements governing “Treasury Withdrawals” actions in Article II, §7. Instead, it records the procedural approach that may guide future budget cycles and the preparation of subsequent treasury withdrawal proposals.\nThe framework also recognizes the constitutional guardrails governing treasury withdrawals, including the requirement that withdrawals must not exceed the Net Change Limit (NCL) and must follow the governance processes defined by the Constitution. By explicitly acknowledging the need for an approved NCL and by stating that treasury withdrawal governance actions must follow the applicable constitutional processes, the framework is consistent with the treasury guardrails defined in Appendix I.\nFinally, the action aligns with the Tenets set forth in Article I. By promoting transparency, structured participation, and predictable governance processes for treasury-funded initiatives, the framework supports the Tenets of decentralization, transparency, and long-term sustainability. Establishing a clear budgeting process improves governance clarity for DReps, vendors, and the wider community, thereby strengthening the ecosystem’s capacity to allocate resources responsibly.",
    "precedentDiscussion": "This decision affirms that Info actions may be used to document governance frameworks, procedural guidelines, or operational processes without directly altering protocol rules or treasury allocations. Recording such frameworks on-chain improves transparency and provides a shared reference point for governance participants, while preserving the requirement that any actual treasury withdrawals must still be submitted and evaluated through separate governance actions.\nCounterargument discussionThis decision affirms that Info actions may be used to document governance frameworks, procedural guidelines, or operational processes without directly altering protocol rules or treasury allocations. Recording such frameworks on-chain improves transparency and provides a shared reference point for governance participants, while preserving the requirement that any actual treasury withdrawals must still be submitted and evaluated through separate governance actions.\nCounterargument discussion\nThis decision affirms that Info actions may be used to document governance frameworks, procedural guidelines, or operational processes without directly altering protocol rules or treasury allocations. Recording such frameworks on-chain improves transparency and provides a shared reference point for governance participants, while preserving the requirement that any actual treasury withdrawals must still be submitted and evaluated through separate governance actions.",
    "counterargumentDiscussion": "One potential concern is that the framework could be interpreted as establishing binding governance rules outside the established governance processes. However, because this action is submitted as an Info action and does not enact any change to the governance structure, protocol parameters, or treasury allocation, it does not override or modify the Constitution. All treasury withdrawals and governance decisions arising from this process remain subject to the constitutional requirements and guardrails that apply to those specific governance action types.",
    "conclusion": "Tingvard finds this governance action constitutional. It complies with Article II, §6 and operates within the scope of an informational governance action under Article III. The proposal records a governance framework that may guide future ecosystem budgeting while preserving the constitutional processes required for treasury withdrawals and other binding governance decisions.",
    "internalVote": {
      "constitutional": 4,
      "unconstitutional": 0,
      "abstain": 0,
      "didNotVote": 1,
      "againstVote": 0
    },
    "references": [
      {
        "@type": "RelevantArticles",
        "label": "CARDANO BLOCKCHAIN ECOSYSTEM CONSTITUTION",
        "uri": "https://ipfs.io/ipfs/bafkreieyuknozbtewyurfqoagvplvykadn6a4u6wglupavdz46bbsnnl6e"
      }
    ]
  },
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Tingvard"
    }
  ]
}