{
  "@context": {
    "@language": "en-us",
    "CIP100": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0100/README.md#",
    "CIP136": "https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0136/README.md#",
    "hashAlgorithm": "CIP100:hashAlgorithm",
    "body": {
      "@id": "CIP136:body",
      "@context": {
        "references": {
          "@id": "CIP100:references",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "GovernanceMetadata": "CIP100:GovernanceMetadataReference",
            "Other": "CIP100:OtherReference",
            "label": "CIP100:reference-label",
            "uri": "CIP100:reference-uri",
            "RelevantArticles": "CIP136:RelevantArticles"
          }
        },
        "summary": "CIP136:summary",
        "rationaleStatement": "CIP136:rationaleStatement",
        "precedentDiscussion": "CIP136:precedentDiscussion",
        "counterargumentDiscussion": "CIP136:counterargumentDiscussion",
        "conclusion": "CIP136:conclusion",
        "internalVote": {
          "@id": "CIP136:internalVote",
          "@container": "@set",
          "@context": {
            "constitutional": "CIP136:constitutional",
            "unconstitutional": "CIP136:unconstitutional",
            "abstain": "CIP136:abstain",
            "didNotVote": "CIP136:didNotVote",
            "againstVote": "CIP136:againstVote"
          }
        }
      }
    },
    "authors": {
      "@id": "CIP100:authors",
      "@container": "@set",
      "@context": {
        "did": "@id",
        "name": "http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/name",
        "witness": {
          "@id": "CIP100:witness",
          "@context": {
            "witnessAlgorithm": "CIP100:witnessAlgorithm",
            "publicKey": "CIP100:publicKey",
            "signature": "CIP100:signature"
          }
        }
      }
    }
  },
  "hashAlgorithm": "blake2b-256",
  "body": {
    "govActionId": "gov_action1w0shrfxqwv95kk0v4cn34wylz25a2cmqkq5jpc0e2yrahhqava3qyxkn2yk",
    "summary": "Tingvard judges the “IO: Consensus Initiative” treasury withdrawal governance action constitutional.",
    "rationaleStatement": "This governance action satisfies the procedural requirements for a treasury withdrawal under Article II, Section 6 and Article II, Section 7.\nThe proposal includes a title, abstract, rationale, supporting materials, and specifies the purpose, delivery period, costs, oversight structure, refund conditions, and prior treasury receipts as required under Article II, Section 7, §1 and §2.\nThe proposal defines administrators responsible for monitoring and disbursement of funds through Intersect-managed smart contracts and oversight structures, satisfying Article II, Section 7, §5.\nThe proposal allocates funding for audits, assurance, and oversight mechanisms, satisfying Article II, Section 7, §4.\nThe proposal further states that treasury-controlled accounts will not delegate to SPOs and will delegate only to the predefined auto-abstain DRep option, satisfying Article II, Section 7, §6.\nThe governance action states that the withdrawal is denominated in ada and does not exceed the active Net Change Limit at the time of submission, in accordance with TREASURY-02a and TREASURY-03a.\nThe proposal also includes references to immutable hosting and document hashing in accordance with Article II, Section 6, §1.\nTingvard therefore finds that the governance action procedurally satisfies the constitutional requirements applicable to treasury withdrawal governance actions.",
    "precedentDiscussion": "NA",
    "counterargumentDiscussion": "NA",
    "conclusion": "Tingvard finds this governance action constitutional.",
    "internalVote": {
      "constitutional": 4,
      "unconstitutional": 0,
      "abstain": 1,
      "didNotVote": 0,
      "againstVote": 0
    },
    "references": []
  },
  "authors": [
    {
      "name": "Tingvard"
    }
  ]
}